Full Article
Evidence Summary
What is an Evidence Summary?
Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide thisIn women with stress urinary incontinence, midurethral or pubovaginal slings are better or no different than the Burch urethropexy for improving symptoms
Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:71.e1-71.e27.
Review question
In women who have stress urinary incontinence, how do slings and the Burch urethropexy compare for improving symptoms?
Background
Stress urinary incontinence is the involuntary leakage of urine during movements and activities such as sneezing and coughing. Stress incontinence in women can be caused by several factors, including menstruation, menopause, pregnancy, childbirth, and surgery.
Burch urethropexy and pubovaginal slings are traditional surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Midurethral slings have been used more commonly in the past 20 years.
How the review was done
The researchers did a systematic review, based on studies available up to April 2013.
They found 49 randomized controlled trials.
The key features of the trials were:
- women had stress urinary incontinence;
- treatments included midurethral slings, pubovaginal slings, and Burch urethropexy;
- follow-up ranged from 12 months to 73 months; and
- outcomes included objective cure (cough stress test, pad testing, urodynamic stress incontinence, and voiding diary data), subjective cure (including incontinence questionnaires and satisfaction measures), perioperative measures (including length of hospital stay and operative time), quality of life, and sexual functioning.
What the researchers found
Compared with Burch urethropexy, midurethral slings were better for perioperative outcomes but not different for objective cure, subjective cure, quality of life, or sexual functioning.
Compared with Burch urethropexy, pubovaginal slings were better for objective and subjective cures, poorer for perioperative outcomes, and not different for quality of life.
Retropubic and obturator slings did not differ for objective or subjective cures, perioperative outcomes, quality of life, or sexual functioning.
There was no moderate or high strength evidence to support comparisons of midurethral and pubovaginal slings.
Conclusions
In women who have stress urinary incontinence, midurethral or pubovaginal slings are better or no different than the Burch urethropexy for improving symptoms.
Treatments for stress urinary incontinence in women*
| Comparisons | Objective cure | Subjective cure | Perioperative outcomes | Quality of life |
| Midurethral sling vs Burch urethropexy | No difference (9 trials, 994 women, moderate-strength evidence) | No difference (8 trials, 712 women, moderate-strength evidence) | Better with sling (9 trials, 964 women, high-strength evidence) | No difference (3 trials, 465 women, moderate-strength evidence) |
| Pubovaginal sling vs Burch urethropexy | Better with sling (4 trials, 855 women, high-strength evidence) | Better with sling (2 trials, 747 women, high-strength evidence) | Better with Burch (3 trials, 819 women, high-strength evidence) | No difference (1 trial, 655 women, high-strength evidence) |
| Retropubic sling vs obturator sling | No difference (19 trials, 3354 women, high-strength evidence) | No difference (18 trials, 3186 women, high-strength evidence) | No difference for most outcomes (21 trials, 3811 women, high-strength evidence) | No difference (15 trials, 2837 women, high-strength evidence) |
Related Topics
Glossary
Before, during, or after surgery.
Studies where people are assigned to one of the treatments purely by chance.
A comprehensive evaluation of the available research evidence on a particular topic.
Related Evidence Summaries
-
Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)
-
Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2016)
-
Screening for prostate cancer
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2013)
