Full Article
Evidence Summary
What is an Evidence Summary?
Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide thisIn people with stable COPD, using LABA and LAMA drugs together rather than alone improves quality of life and reduces breathlessness
Oba Y, Sarva ST, Dias S Efficacy and safety of long-acting beta-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combinations in COPD: a network meta-analysis. Thorax. 2016;71:15-25.
Review question
In people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), does a combination of long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) drugs reduce symptoms and improve quality of life?
Background
COPD is a lung disease with inflammation. It reduces the flow of air through the lungs and is often associated with smoking. Symptoms of COPD include difficulty breathing, cough, wheezing, and chest tightness.
COPD can be treated, and several types of drugs can help control symptoms. Bronchodilator drugs, including LABAs and LAMAs, help relax muscles around the airways and make it easier to breath. Using a LABA and a LAMA together may control symptoms better than using either drug alone.
How the review was done
The researchers did a systematic review, searching for studies up to May 2015.
The found 23 randomized controlled trials with 27,172 people (average age 61 to 69 years, 52% to 96% men, 26% to 63% current smokers).
The key features of the trials were:
- people had moderate or severe COPD, without a recent exacerbation;
- people with asthma, other diseases that affect breathing, or cardiovascular disease were excluded;
- treatment was a LABA drug (formoterol, indacaterol, olodaterol, salmeterol, or vilanterol) combined with a LAMA drug (aclidinium, glycopyrronium, umeclidinium, or tiotropium);
- combination treatment was compared with placebo or a LABA or LAMA drug alone;
- people were treated for 12 weeks or more; and
- most people did not know which treatment they were getting during the trials.
Trials were combined using a type of analysis (“network meta-analysis”) that lets you compare treatments even if they were not compared directly in the individual trials.
What the researchers found
Compared with placebo, LABA/LAMA combination:
- improved quality of life and breathlessness when measured at 3 and 6 months;
- reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations; and
- had similar rates of severe exacerbations, death, and serious adverse events.
Compared with LABA alone, LABA/LAMA combination:
- improved quality of life when measured at 3 months and breathlessness when measured at 3 and 6 months;
- reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations; and
- had similar quality of life when measured at 6 months and similar rates of severe exacerbations, death, and serious adverse events.
Compared with LAMA alone, LABA/LAMA combination:
- improved quality of life and breathlessness when measured at 3 and 6 months; and
- had similar rates of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, severe exacerbations, death, and serious adverse events.
Conclusions
In people with stable COPD, a LABA/LAMA combination improves quality of life and reduces breathlessness more than placebo, a LABA alone, or a LAMA alone. Treatments had similar rates of adverse events, including deaths.
LABA/LAMA drug combination vs placebo, LABA alone, or LAMA alone in COPD
| Outcomes | Number of trials (people) | Effect of combination treatment* |
| Quality of life at 6 months | 12 trials (18,536 people) | More people had improved quality of life than with placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
| Breathlessness at 6 months | 7 trials (9,045 people) | More people had improved breathlessness than with placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
| Moderate-to-severe exacerbations | 16 trials (18,224 people) | Fewer people had moderate or severe exacerbations than with placebo or LABA alone |
|
|
| No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and LAMA alone |
| Severe exacerbations | 19 trials (25,401 people) | No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
| Death | 15 trials (24,041 people) | No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
| Serious adverse events | 20 trials (27,172 people) | No difference in effect between LABA/LAMA and placebo or LABA or LAMA alone |
Related Topics
Glossary
Advanced statistical methods contrasting and combining results from different studies.
An approach that simultaneously compares multiple treatments.
A harmless, inactive, and simulated treatment.
Studies where people are assigned to one of the treatments purely by chance.
A comprehensive evaluation of the available research evidence on a particular topic.
The body's network of blood vessels. It includes the arteries, veins, and capillaries that carry blood to and from the heart.
Related Evidence Summaries
-
Home or community-based rehabilitation is as effective as hospital rehabilitation for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Cadernos de Saúde Pública (2016)
-
Remote versus face-to-face check-ups for asthma
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2016)
-
Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2013)


