Full Article
Evidence Summary
What is an Evidence Summary?
Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide thisIn adults with acute low back pain, spinal manipulation improves pain and function by a small amount in the short term
Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Booth MS, et al. Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017;317:1451-60.
Review questions
In adults with acute low back pain (pain lasting for 6 weeks or less), does spinal manipulative therapy (spinal manipulation) reduce pain or improve functioning more than other therapies? What are the harms?
Background
Most people will have low back pain at some point in their lives. Anyone can get low back pain although it is more common as you get older. The cause of low back pain is often unknown.
There are many treatments for acute low back pain. These include pain-relieving and muscle-relaxing drugs, heat, exercise, physical therapy, and spinal manipulation. Spinal manipulation involves hands-on therapies, including chiropractic therapy. This review assessed how well spinal manipulation works compared with other therapies.
How the review was done
The researchers did a systematic review of studies available up to February 2017.
They found 26 randomized controlled trials with 2,908 people who had an average age of 26 to 44 years.
The key features of the studies were:
- people were adults with low back pain lasting for 6 weeks or less;
- treatment was spinal manipulation alone or with other therapies, including chiropractic care;
- spinal manipulation was done by physical therapists, chiropractors, medical doctors, or osteopaths;
- spinal manipulation was compared with different therapies (mainly pain-relieving drugs, exercise, physical therapy, or usual care) or sham therapy (placebo); and
- people were followed for up to 6 weeks.
Studies done only in people with sciatica or those in hospital were excluded.
What the researchers found
Compared with another therapy, spinal manipulation:
- improved pain by a small amount for up to 6 weeks; and
- improved function by a small amount at 3 to 6 weeks.
The effects of spinal manipulation were quite different (heterogeneous) across trials.
Few trials compared spinal manipulation with sham therapy.
There wasn’t much information reported about the adverse effects of spinal manipulation compared with other therapies.
Conclusion
In adults with acute low back pain, spinal manipulative therapy improves pain and functioning by a small amount in the short term.
Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) vs another therapy in adults with acute low back pain
| Outcomes | Follow-up period | Number of trials (number of people) | Absolute effects of SMT |
| Pain | 2 weeks or less | 9 trials (663 people)* | On average, SMT reduced pain scores by about 10 points out of 100, although results varied across the trials*. |
|
| 3 to 6 weeks | 10 trials (1142 people) | On average, SMT reduced pain scores by about 10 points out of 100, although results varied across trials. |
| Functioning | 2 weeks or less | 7 trials (491 people)* | No difference between SMT and other therapies. |
|
| 3 to 6 weeks | 6 trials (762 people) | On average, SMT improved functioning by a small amount, although results varied across trials. |
Related Topics
Glossary
A harmless, inactive, and simulated treatment.
Studies where people are assigned to one of the treatments purely by chance.
A comprehensive evaluation of the available research evidence on a particular topic.
Related Evidence Summaries
-
Yoga for chronic non-specific low back pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2022)
-
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2020)
-
In people with a herniated disc in the lower back, low-quality evidence suggests surgery may reduce pain and improve function in the short term
Clin Rehabil (2017)
