Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: A systematic review

Findings

Evidence Summary

Evidence Summary
Supporting technical documents that are social systems-relevant

Not usually available for this document type
Scientific Abstract

PubMed
Scientific Abstract

Publisher

Recency, quality and context of the findings

Last year literature searched

2016
Year Published

2017
Quality Rating

7/9 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conducted

Australia (4+); New Zealand (2); Norway (2); UK (England) (2); Denmark (1); Netherlands (1); UK (1); USA (1)
Global/regional focus

WHO - Americas region<br />WHO - European region<br />WHO - Western Pacific region<br />
Country focus

Australia (4+); New Zealand (2); Norway (2); UK (England) (2); Denmark (1); Netherlands (1); UK (1); USA (1)
Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus

Additional details about the research

Type of document

Systematic review addressing other questions
Type of question

Description
Focus

Specific
Target

Individual
Domain

Programs and services
Community and social services
Other social services
Sustainable Development Goals
3. Good health and well-being (partially covered)
Social system topic(s)

Delivery arrangements
How services are designed to meet citizens’ needs
Package of services/service pathways
Theme

Optimal aging

Publication details

Citation

Sims-Gould J, Tong CE, Wallis-Mayer L, Ashe MC. Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2017;18(8):653-663.
DOI

101016/j.jamda.2016.12.070

Register for free access to all Professional content

+AA