Full Article

McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Policymaker (health systems) article

Remote versus face-to-face check-ups for asthma

Findings
Recency, quality and context of the findings
  • Last year literature searched
    2015
  • Year Published
    2016
  • Quality Rating
    10/11 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
  • Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conducted
    UK (England) (2); Denmark (1); Netherlands (1); UK (1); USA (1)
  • Global/regional focus
    Not yet available
  • Country focus
    UK (England) (2); Denmark (1); Netherlands (1); UK (1); USA (1)
  • Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus
s
Additional details about the research
  • Type of document
    Systematic review of effects
  • Type of question
    Many
  • Focus
    Specific
  • Target
    Individual
  • Priority Area
    Not applicable
  • Health system topic(s)
    Delivery arrangements
    How care is designed to meet consumers' needs
    Case management
    By whom care is provided
    Self-management
    Where care is provided
    Site of service delivery
    With what supports is care provided
    ICT that support individuals who receive care
    Implementation strategies
    Consumer-targeted strategy
    Behaviour change support
  • Theme
    Optimal aging
  • Domain
    Diseases
    Non-communicable diseases
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Technologies
    Devices
    Sectors
    Home care
    Providers
    Physicians
    Generalist
    Specialist
    Nurse
Publication details
  • Citation
    Kew KM & Cates CJ. Remote versus face-to-face check-ups for asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;(4):Art. No.: CD011715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011715.pub2.
  • DOI
    10.1002/14651858.CD011715.pub2

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register