McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.



  • Badhiwala JH
  • Nassiri F
  • Alhazzani W
  • Selim MH
  • Farrokhyar F
  • Spears J, et al.
JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1832-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13767. (Review)
PMID: 26529161
Read abstract Read evidence summary Read full text
Disciplines
  • Hospital Doctor/Hospitalists
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Internal Medicine
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Neurology
    Relevance - 7/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Emergency Medicine
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Endovascular intervention for acute ischemic stroke improves revascularization. But trials examining endovascular therapy yielded variable functional outcomes, and the effect of endovascular intervention among subgroups needs better definition.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between endovascular mechanical thrombectomy and clinical outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke.

DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library without language restriction through August 2015.

STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials of endovascular therapy with mechanical thrombectomy vs standard medical care, which includes the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Independent reviewers evaluated the quality of studies and abstracted the data. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for all outcomes using random-effects meta-analyses and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to examine whether certain imaging, patient, treatment, or study characteristics were associated with improved functional outcome. The strength of the evidence was examined for all outcomes using the GRADE method.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ordinal improvement across modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores at 90 days, functional independence (mRS score, 0-2), angiographic revascularization at 24 hours, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days, and all-cause mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS: Data were included from 8 trials involving 2423 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [14.4] years; 1131 [46.7%] women), including 1313 who underwent endovascular thrombectomy and 1110 who received standard medical care with tPA. In a meta-analysis of these trials, endovascular therapy was associated with a significant proportional treatment benefit across mRS scores (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.14-2.13; P = .005). Functional independence at 90 days (mRS score, 0-2) occurred among 557 of 1293 patients (44.6%; 95% CI, 36.6%-52.8%) in the endovascular therapy group vs 351 of 1094 patients (31.8%; 95% CI, 24.6%-40.0%) in the standard medical care group (risk difference, 12%; 95% CI, 3.8%-20.3%; OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.18-2.49; P = .005). Compared with standard medical care, endovascular thrombectomy was associated with significantly higher rates of angiographic revascularization at 24 hours (75.8% vs 34.1%; OR, 6.49; 95% CI, 4.79-8.79; P < .001) but no significant difference in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days (70 events [5.7%] vs 53 events [5.1%]; OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77-1.63; P = .56) or all-cause mortality at 90 days (218 deaths [15.8%] vs 201 deaths [17.8%]; OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68-1.12; P = .27).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke, endovascular therapy with mechanical thrombectomy vs standard medical care with tPA was associated with improved functional outcomes and higher rates of angiographic revascularization, but no significant difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or all-cause mortality at 90 days.


Clinical Comments

Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)

Another treatment modality for acute stroke in addition to tissue plasminogen with slightly better functional outcomes (but no change in mortality at 90 days). For primary care clinicians, the bottom line is to just ensure there is minimal delay in getting people who are having a acute stroke to a stroke unit as soon as possible.

Internal Medicine

Very robust positive effect of the newer devices in appropriately selected patients, with remarkably little morbidity, it appears.

Neurology

This meta-analysis of the mechanical thrombectomy trials does not really add much to the conclusions drawn from each study. The main message is already well known to practitioners involved. Pooled analysis of the individual patient data would have greater power for answering more questions in regard to subgroups and imaging.

Neurology

Meta-analyses of these thrombectomy trials have been published before, so analysis of individual patient data would be much more useful. The potential benefits of thrombectomy in appropriate cases are now clear, but benefits in routine practice will depend critically on operator experience, type of device used, efficient organisation and networking of services, and correct patient selection. Key unanswered questions include the time window for effective intervention and limits of extractable thrombus location and age and comorbidity of patients. More trials involving less-privileged centres with more typical patients and economic analysis are needed.

Neurology

With right patient selection, the significant functional recovery observed post thombectomy warrants more investment in training people who can perform the procedure, so that the facility is available round the clock.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register