Full Article
Back
s
Policymaker (health systems) article
Evaluating hospital tools and services that were co-produced with patients: A rapid review
Findings
-
Evidence Summary
-
Supporting technical documents that are health systems-relevantNot usually available for this document type
-
Scientific Abstract
-
Scientific Abstract
Recency, quality and context of the findings
-
Last year literature searched2019
-
Year Published2020
-
Quality Rating7/10 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
-
Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conductedUK (England) (4); Australia (2); Canada (2); Sweden (2); Netherlands (1); Spain (1); UK (Scotland) (1)
-
Global/regional focusNot yet available
-
Country focusUK (England) (4); Australia (2); Canada (2); Sweden (2); Netherlands (1); Spain (1); UK (Scotland) (1)
-
Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus
Additional details about the research
-
Type of documentSystematic review of effects
-
Type of questionEffectiveness
-
FocusSpecific
-
TargetIndividual
Health system
-
Priority AreaNot applicable
-
Health system topic(s)Governance arrangementsConsumer & stakeholder involvementConsumer participation in service deliveryDelivery arrangementsHow care is designed to meet consumers' needsCase managementWith what supports is care providedOther ICT that support individuals who provide careICT that support individuals who receive careImplementation strategiesConsumer-targeted strategyInformation or education provisionSystem participation
-
ThemeOptimal aging
-
DomainSectorsHospital careProvidersPhysiciansSpecialist
Publication details
-
CitationLim S, Morris H, Pizzirani B, Kajewski D, Lee WK, Skouteris H. Evaluating hospital tools and services that were co-produced with patients: A rapid review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2020.
-
DOI10.1093/intqhc/mzaa020


