Full Article

McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Policymaker (social systems) article

Psychosocial benefits of cooking interventions: A systematic review

Findings
Recency, quality and context of the findings
  • Last year literature searched
    2017
  • Year Published
    2018
  • Quality Rating
    6/9 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
  • Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conducted
    Canada (4); Australia (2); USA (2); Finland (1); Israel (1); UK (England) (1)
  • Global/regional focus
    WHO - Americas region<br />WHO - European region<br />WHO - Western Pacific region<br />
  • Country focus
    Canada (4); Australia (2); USA (2); Finland (1); Israel (1); UK (England) (1)
  • Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus
Additional details about the research
  • Type of document
    Systematic review addressing other questions
  • Type of question
    Not effectiveness
  • Focus
    Specific
  • Target
    Individual
    Community
  • Domain
    Programs and services
    Community and social services
    Community services
    Food safety and security
    Nutritional awareness and education
    Sustainable Development Goals
    2. Zero hunger
    3. Good health and well-being (partially covered)
    17. Partnerships for the goals
  • Social system topic(s)
    Delivery arrangements
    How services are designed to meet citizens’ needs
    Group services
    Implementation strategies
    Citizen-targeted strategy
    Information or education provision
    Skills and competencies development
  • Theme
    Optimal aging
Publication details
  • Citation
    Farmer N, Touchton-Leonard K, Ross A. Psychosocial benefits of cooking interventions: A systematic review. Health Education & Behavior. 2018;45(2):167-180.
  • DOI
    10.1177/1090198117736352

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register